|
PROJECT EVALUATION |
|||||
|
Task |
Beginning |
Developing |
Accomplished |
Exemplary |
Score |
|
Submitted an answer for each question on
Blackboard |
Did not complete the task of answering the
questions |
Answers show a vague understanding of the
situations |
Answers show a basic understanding of the
situations |
Answers show a good understanding of the
situations |
|
|
Prepared (typed) a two-column newsletter using
Publisher |
Formatting incomplete; many typing errors |
Shows some formatting technique; newsletter typed
with many errors |
Articles correctly formatted; newsletter typed
with several errors |
Articles correctly formatted; newsletter typed
with three or fewer errors |
|
|
Prepared an accurate article rewriting the Dedham
AUP |
Article depicts no understanding of the AUP |
Article depicts little understanding of the AUP |
Article depicts a basic understanding of the AUP |
Article depicts a complete and factual
understanding of the AUP |
|
|
Prepared an article depicting ten rules for
Internet safety |
Article poorly written; does not include 10
safety rules |
Article poorly written; includes10 safety rules |
Article adequately written; includes 10 safety
rules |
Article well written and easy to understand;
includes ten safety rules |
|
|
Prepared a non-bias article providing answers to
the Blackboard questions in a question/answer format |
Article poorly written; no format; mostly
incorrect answers |
Article poorly written; format needs improvement;
several incorrect answers |
Article adequately written; format needs
improvement; errors in a few answers |
Article well written; follows correct format;
answers the questions correctly |
|
|
Created a unique, eye-catching title for the
newsletter |
Basic newsletter title; shows no imagination |
Basic newsletter title; makes a connection to the
topic |
Good title; makes a connection to the topic |
Unique title; relates well to the topic |
|
|
Worked cooperatively |
Did not work well together most of the time |
Worked well together half of the time |
Worked well together most of the time |
Worked well together all of the time |
|
|
Used time well |
Made poor use of class time; attention seldom on
the project |
Used the class time adequately; attention on the
project most of the time |
Used the class time well; attention seldom
strayed from the project |
Always used class time correctly; attention did not
stray from project |
|